“Graffittied Graffiti”

At a gallery within a shopping complex in the South Korean capital, a couple saw paint cans and brushes at their reach and use next to what was actually a finished portrait worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. Thinking the available paint and brushes was a signal to be a part of the art, they ended up technically vandalizing the artists’ work. The incident has sparked controversy and conversation on what it means about authenticity and authorship, consider the artists’ intentions with the piece was to emulate vandalism, specifically through a graffiti aesthetic.

External sources:

Posted by

on

Effectiveness

How does this project help? , ,

Timeframe For change

Provide conversation on is it okay to monetize and capitalize on an art form that has roots in protest and an outlet for working class artists.

Notes:

It was not intentional, but the incident that arised due to the objectives of the artist and what he was trying to symbolize with this piece led to these issues arising.